References

Breast biopsies

  1. Elfgen, C., Papassotiropoulos, B., Varga, Z., Moskovszky, L., Nap, M., Güth, U., Baege, A., Amann, E., Chiesa, F., & Tausch, C. (2019). Comparative analysis of confocal microscopy on fresh breast core needle biopsies and conventional histology (Diagn Pathol (2019) 14:58 DOI: 10.1186/s13000-019-0835-z). Diagnostic Pathology, 14(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-019-0835-z

    BCS

  2. Sandor, M. F., Schwalbach, B., Hofmann, V., Istrate, S. E., Schuller, Z., Ionescu, E., Heimann, S., Ragazzi, M., & Lux, M. P. (2022). Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study. Breast, 66(June), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2022.10.003

  3. Togawa, R., Hederer, J., Ragazzi, M., Bruckner, T., Fastner, S., Gomez, C., Hennigs, A., Nees, J., Pfob, A., Riedel, F., Schäfgen, B., Stieber, A., Lux, M. P., Heil, J., & Golatta, M. (2023). Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscopy ‘Histolog® scanner’ for breast margin assessment in comparison with conventional specimen radiography. Breast, 68(February), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.010

  4. Angelica Conversano, Muriel Abbaci, Paul van Diest, Aurélie Roulot, Giuseppe Falco, Malek Ferchiou, Saverio Coiro, Milan Richir, Pierre-MichelGenolet, Carine Clement, Odile Casiraghi, Aicha Ben Lahkdar, Nizard Labaied, Moira Ragazzi, Marie-Christine Mathieu - Breast carcinoma detection in ex-vivo fresh human breast surgical specimens using fast slide-free confocal microscopy scanner: the HIBISCUSS project

  5. R. Jeevan et al., “Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: Retrospective study of hospital episode statistics,” BMJ, vol. 345, no. 7869, 2012, doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4505

  6. C. Baliski, L. Hughes, and B. Bakos, “Lowering Re-excision Rates After Breast-Conserving Surgery: Unraveling the Intersection Between Surgeon Case Volumes and Techniques,” Ann. Surg. Oncol., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 894–901, 2021, doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08731-z.

    Dermatology

  7. Grizzetti, L., & Kuonen, F. (2022). Ex vivo confocal microscopy for surgical margin assessment: A histology‐compared study on 109 specimens. Skin Health and Disease, September 2021, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.91

  8. Kechrid, N., Tonellotto, L., Monnier, S., Rossi, S. A., Ulrich, F., & Kuonen, F. (2022). Ex vivo confocal microscopy for the intraoperative assessment of deep margins in giant basal cell carcinoma. JAAD Case Reports, 27, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.07.008

  9. Peters, N., Schubert, M., Metzler, G., Geppert, J. P., & Moehrle, M. (2019). Diagnostic accuracy of a new ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscope compared to H&E-stained paraffin slides for micrographic surgery of basal cell carcinoma. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 33(2), 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15243

    Urology

  10. Baas, D. J. H., Vreuls, W., Sedelaar, J. P. M., Vrijhof, H. J. E. J., Hoekstra, R. J., Zomer, S. F., van Leenders, G. J. L. H., van Basten, J. P. A., & Somford, D. M. (2022). Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. BJU International, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15938

  11. Jeong, H., Choo, M.S., Cho, M.C. et al. Prediction of surgical margin status and location after radical prostatectomy using positive biopsy sites on 12-core standard prostate biopsy. Sci Rep 12, 4066 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08022-5

  12. Herlemann, A., Cowan, J. E., Carroll, P. R. & Cooperberg, M. R. Community-based outcomes of open versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. 73, 215–223 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.027